About Me

Name: Rick
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

Isn't the title for John Edwards' wife Mrs. Edwards?

Posted by Rick on Thursday, June 28, 2007 9:00:43 AM
Ms. Edwards Asks Coulter to Stop Attacks


http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/06/26/politics/p155759D76.DTL

When did John Edwards' wife earn the title of Ms. Edwards?  Is this an attempt to pay homage to the femi-nazis?  Just curious.  Would someone out there PLEASE answer this question?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rosie is a LIAR!!! Here's how.

Posted by Rick on Wednesday, June 27, 2007 8:11:43 AM
That "picture" of her daughter with the belt of faux bullets slung over her shoulder is a FAKE!  Here's why. 

Were it a real event, you would figure that Rosie would have shot video of the event.  Since her daughter didn't want really to WEAR the costume, Rosie could only get a picture.  Had she used video, you would have seen the daughter crying and arguing with her mother,

"Mommy, I don't want to wear this!  Why are you making me wear this.  Isn't there a CHOICE for me NOT to wear this?"

Oh!  Another issue you MAY be able to take to the bank.  Apparently, her daughter is not going to "embrace" the same lifestyle that Rosie has chosen because the little girl appears not to mind getting poked in the face with sharp objects!  In the picture, the bullets in the belt are pointed towards her face.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is it I, or are online media outlets embracing a homosexual agenda...

Posted by Rick on Sunday, June 24, 2007 9:29:21 PM
 
Precious, right, a 6-week-old kitten, gets a meal from Honey, a 7-year-old dog Tuesday, Oct. 2, 2007 in Stephens City, Via. The golden retriever _ had not given birth in 18 months, but after her owner, Jimmy Martin, brought home the kitten, she suddenly found herself playing the role of mother. Honey began producing milk for the little feline after hearing its cries. (AP Photo/The Winchester Star, Scott Mason)

What's with all these pictures of dogs and cats snuggling with one another?  To me, this smacks of an attempt by the "media" to indoctrinate young minds that it's okay to see dogs and cats sleeping together just like it's okay for two men or two women to be sleeping together.  It's a manifestation of the "I'm okay; you're okay" mindet.  As long as no one is getting "hurt" there are no issues with these lifestyles.  Of course, this depends on what your definition of PAIN is.

Here is another cross-species love video.  This one contains a HUGE pitbull dog loving some tiny chicks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2OC5Z1Fii8

Not only are the media out to influence us humans into accepting ALL relationships, since they are getting kickbacks from the legal field, but now they are out to influence religion by explaining that there are female sharks that some aquarium has kept isolated from male sharks and that the female shark is pregnant.  The media want us to believe that animals can have immaculate conception too!  So THAT sort of dampens the excitement associated with the birth, life, and death of our Savior Jesus Christ.  Since it can happen to a shark, then it must not be such a big deal.

  Here is another picture of an animal that appears to be the product of "cross-species" breeding.  So, soon, the media will be telling us,

"Look!  The animals do it!  Since we are animals like they are, it is okay for us to do it too!" 

You just wait!  Call me what you will, but soon what we humans used to consider a disgusting habit will be embraced by the media, and the media will tell us that it is better if Bubba "breeds" with the sheep because THAT is better than having him trying to knock up his little sister or cousin.  Getting off one's rocks will be raised to a level of respect that it has not seen since the downfall of Rome!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Let's Withdraw Congress from the U.S!

Posted by Rick on Saturday, June 23, 2007 11:46:35 AM
If the opinion of Congress is SO low, we need to withdraw it from the United States!

This is what Harry Reid should be explaining because this is what he says about the Iraq War!  Since public opinion is SO low in support of the war in Iraq, we need to do "something," and his "something" is to reduce our presence in the area so that the "freedom fighters" will like us more!

Well, we Americans would like it more if Congress followed his logic and removed itself (withdrew) from the battlefield of American culture.  Amscray, Congress!

Makes a world of sense to me.  They would be following his logic, and since he is the "Leader" of the Senate, he MUST be one of the smartest men in the country.  So his logic must work!  Since the public's opinion of Congress is lower than the opinion of the Iraq War, it must take a higher priority than the withdrawal from Iraq.

So, you first, Harry!  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More Reflections on the Clinton Years

Posted by Rick on Friday, June 08, 2007 10:00:18 AM
Libs of all stripes like to reflect on the '90s as a wonderful time when gas prices were low, and no one was bothering us.  Foreign affairs were an afterthought, and only the bubble-headed goons in Washington, D.C. needed to concern themselves with any of those global issues.

The Soviet Union was gone.  It evaporated early in the '90s thanks to the efforts of Reagan/Bush, and we turned missle silos into high-end housing.  It took a LOT of cash to transform an usable but newly-obsolete silo into living space.  Nonetheless, such tasks appealed to some people, and such things happened - back in the '90s.

The new millenium dawned in 2001.  We Americans decided we'd had enough of democratic politics of the '90s at the helm and elected GWB to the office at the end of the year prior.  No problem.  The Dims went screaming and crying because of dimpled chads and a failed election system of which they approved until this particular election.  It was the Dims who gave us the voting system that we had here in PBC until the election in '00. 

We elected GWB, and gas prices started to move.  Can anyone tell me WHY prices started shooting through the roof upon GWB's election?  Well, the reason is simple.  The election of GWB meant that we, as a country, were more likely to respond militarily to events such as the bombing of the U.S. embassiess in Africa.  The people who buy and sell gas futures knew that a dimocratic administration would not respond militarily to minor attacks that are far away.  So fuel prices didn't move much during this time.

Well, we got the sucker punch on the morning of 9/11/01.  The attack surpassed all attacks suffered during the 90s and the Clinton administration: the U.S. embassies in Africa and the Cole to which Clinton asked the military just to shrug it off. 

So, for those of you who are kicking and screaming about the gas prices, you need to vote for one of those "troops-supporting" dimocrats.  Be warned, however, in that doing so is likely to get us attacked again in a manner that will make the attacks on 9/11 look like minor events.  So it's a gamble you have to consider during the next elections. 

To vote for a dim is to ask the terrorists to attack us again because we will refuse to take the fight to them.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hitlary's Code

Posted by Rick on Friday, June 08, 2007 9:41:29 AM
For those of you who have forgotten the eight years when Billy Clinton served as POTUS, you need to be reminded of the Clinton Code.  It seemed that whenever Clinton told us something "truthful" he was lying through his teeth.  It was his "code."  He would tell his closest friends,

"Watch me pull the wool over these people's eyes.  Whenever I mention the word 'truthful,' it means that what you are hearing is a lie."

The word "honest" doesn't exist in their lexicon.  There is no wiggling around the meaning of the term "honest," while you can throw some doubt at the meaning of the word "truthful" and make it stick. 

My personal aversion to seeing Hitlary on TV keeps me from listening too closely to what she says.  The tone of her voice makes the hair on the back of my neck crawl.  Too bad she can't hire a voice coach to change her voice like she hired a cosmetician to change the way she appears on TV.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tropical Storm Barely - not Barry.

Posted by Rick on Saturday, June 02, 2007 9:09:59 AM
From the "front lines" of Tropical Storm Barely - errr...Barry.    

Just a little wind and a lot more much-needed rain.

The weathermen/women were explaining LAST week just how much water we needed down here in S. Florida, and the weather gods responded this weekend.  No big deal.  Now, the weather-people will be telling us that the weather god needs to turn OFF the spiggot, or we're going to drown!  *laughter*
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

If you look closely enough

Posted by Rick on Wednesday, May 23, 2007 8:12:23 AM
 AP PhotoWhat you are not seeing in this picture is the half-dozen marine guns pointed at his head and a major demanding that he smile "just the right amount."

My prediction is that we will learn that we have OBL in custody, and that we have HAD him in custody since shortly after 9/11.

This will be a parting middle-finger from the Bush Administration to the Dimocrats and their allies in the Drive-By Media (DBM).

The expression on his face LOOKS like he knows that he is doomed.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Minor Oversight

Posted by Rick on Monday, May 21, 2007 2:50:58 PM
From Yahoo.com,

KATHMANDU (Reuters) - Explorers have discovered a series of caves decorated with ancient Buddhist paintings, set in sheer cliffs in Nepal's remote Himalayan north, leaving archaeologists excited and puzzled.

An international team of scholars, archaeologists, climbers and explorers examined at least 12 cave complexes at 14,000 feet near Lo Manthang, a mediaeval walled city in Nepal's Mustang district, about 125 km (80 miles) northwest of Kathmandu.

The caves contain paintings that could date back as far as the 13th century, as well as Tibetan scripts executed in ink, silver and gold and pre-Christian era pottery shards.

"Who lived in those caves? When were they there, when were (the caves) first excavated and how did the residents access them, perched as they are on vertical cliffs?" asked Broughton Coburn, an American member of the survey team.

"It's a compelling, marvelous mystery."

Explorers from the United States, Italy and Nepal used ice axes and ropes to climb to the caves, cutting steps in the cliff face as they went.

If you ask me, the "monks" made these caves BACK when the earth's water table was MUCH higher and accessing these caves was less of a chore!  Isn't this what Algore or L Ron Gore likes to have us believe?  Wait-a-minute!  Just because the earth's ocean levels MAY flood the earth in the future, doesn't mean that they have in the past!  This L Ron Gore principle flies in the FACE of accepted environmental philisophy today.

My tiny brain can't remember the term, but there is one to describe the assumption that scientists make that there are no differences in the environment today versus the environment of the past.  Things are as they are now today because it is how they were back then.  Again, my little brain can't remember what this term is, but it DOES remember reading about it in a science book from either middle school or high school.  If any of you can remember this term, don't be shy about it!  Share it with me!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

He consumes paper like he consumes power!

Posted by Rick on Monday, May 21, 2007 2:00:21 PM


This is Algore's office in Tennessee!  Is THIS the office of someone who is concerned with the health of the world's rain forests?  Look at all that paper!  You would think that someone with THREE monitors on his desk would be demanding that his clients/associates send him electronic versions of the paperwork with which he needs to deal.  Granted, you are burning electrons in THAT particular process, but the media like to tell us that consuming electricity is better than consuming paper products. 

Is that a rainbow frog on Algore's wall?  We ALL know what the rainbow means, right?  *laughter*
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Elections '08

Posted by Rick on Tuesday, May 01, 2007 1:17:21 PM
My father would refer to this as "interesting."

What we have here is "failure" to communicate.  Some men you just can't reach.  What do you think the Stock Market will think if we get a Dim in the Whitehouse at the end-of-'08?  You are going to see MASSIVE selling on the afternoon of November 2, 2008 if the Dims are looking like they are going to take back the White House and the third branch of the U.S. government that has eluded them since GWB assumed control early in '00.

The media will spin this as the result of the Republicans controling the government for SO long and the END of Newt's Revolution which he started in '94 and that a change-of-control doomed the economy once the Dims came back.  Well, THAT is not the issue.  If THIS were the case, the market would have shot through-the-roof in '02 at the election of Billy Bob Clinton.  The market skyrocketed AFTER Newt's efforts bore fruit in '94, not prior, yet the Dims still give credit to Billy Bob - not Newt!

The Street will be selling, should the election work this way, because you will have a single party in control of both the legislative and executive branches of the government, and the Street does NOT approve of such a situation.  We can go back to Carter in the late '70s, Clinton in the early '90s, or Bush in the mid '00s.  Granted, it took six years of GWB's presidency for the people to throw his republican party out of the legislature, but the Dims will dismiss that as an effect of 9/11. 

No one knew there were Republicans while Carter was in office.  So they were not a threat back then.  The people gave Carter the boot once they realized that an election involves a CHOICE, and the election of Reagan saw the birth of the contemporary Republican party.

The reason why the Dims are kicking and screaming about the War Funding bill is that what have they got to show for the effort should GWB decide to start pulling troops out of Iraq BEFORE the '08 elections ramp up?  The way it's sitting now, should this happen, the Dims will be able to say,

"Wait a minute!  We tried to pull troops out of Iraq in '07, but you said, 'no,' Mr. President."

All this kicking and screaming by the Left is nothing more than a little CYA from the crybabies on the Left.  They want to make sure that they look like they were TRYING to "end" the war before Bush tried to "end" the war.

Crud, this made more sense in my brain earlier this morning, but one of the issues doesn't seem to be making it into this explanation.

So, those of you out there who want to see the economy keep chugging along, keep a Republican behind-the-desk in the Oval Office.  This act will keep Wall Street happy and the terrorists awake at night.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How much longer until the libs start blaming oil wells for tsunamis?

Posted by Rick on Monday, April 09, 2007 1:03:53 PM
How much longer until the liberals in the Western world start blaming the oil industry for the tsunamis that seem to be occurring more often these days than they have EVER in the past?

Two tsunamis in nearly three years!  How long until the mental giants in the liberal democratic party start putting the pieces together and explain that it is we humans who are making these events more severe by removing the lubrication that Mother Earth uses to lubricate the plates.  Since we are "harvesting" this lubrication, the events are becoming more severe and killing more people in more drastic events.

The fact that most people in the third-world don't know how to swim leads me to another crazy conclusion.  Perhaps these liberals need to start demanding that the U.N. provides swimming lessons for the third world!  Which option makes more sense from a financial perspective?  *laughter*
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Whom Will Our New Blowhard-in-Chief Support for President?

Posted by Rick on Friday, April 06, 2007 5:56:50 PM
A question that no one in-the-media seems to be answering is whom, among the democratic candidates, does Nancy Pelosi support?  We're given the impression, by the media, that this woman has the ability to negotiate with foreign countries.  Someone needs to show me where in the constitution it is that states that the house leader has that ability.

Not only that, but she is lying to Syria when she tells them that Israel is ready-to-negotiate.  What nerve!

Would she support Hillary?  Would she support Obama?  My tiny brain can't decide!  If she's the Hillary-type, then she is fighting the Queen-Bee issue.  If she like Obama, then she has the WEIGHT of Hillary and her supporters working against her, and her days as a "conscious" house leader may be numbered.

It's a lose-lose.  Someone, please get me some popcorn!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It's the SIN of Pride!

Posted by Rick on Friday, April 06, 2007 10:20:13 AM
Here is the lead paragraph from a Yahoo story,

BRUSSELS, Belgium - An international global warming conference approved a report Friday warning of dire threats to the Earth and to mankind — from increased hunger to the extinction of species — unless the world adapts to climate change and halts its progress.

Sure!  Global warming is a threat!  However, is it a threat that we humans can control?  Do we humans have control of the sun?  Heck, most of us barely have control of our cars on the way to and from work!  Again, do we humans have the ability to control what the sun does?

IMHO, No.  The warming (AND COOLING) of the earth is a cyclic function, and there is nothing that we, as humans, can do about it.  It is even sillier to consider that we are shooting off our noses to spite our faces if we think that we can affect CO2 emissions by demanding that the cleanest countries (The Americas and those in Western Europe) clean up THEIR acts before we demand the same of the dirtiest countries (China and India).

Forgive me for the redundancy, but this effort makes sense only to liberal Europeans and like-minded Americans.  The Chinese and Indians will resist the effort, of course.  More power to them! 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What's Happening with the Democratic Party NOW!!!

Posted by Rick on Monday, April 02, 2007 12:26:04 PM
What's happening is a battle between New School Liberals (The Clintonistas) and the NEWEST School Liberals (The Obamazens).  The NSLs are still dancing over the defeat of the OSLs with whom they have fought since days of Camelot.  No idea WHY they are dancing over the victory because these people are dying EVERY day!

Anyway, a new threat has appeared on the horizon: Obama - that's Barak to those of you in Rio Linda.

Hillary has paid her debts to her husband, and now is the time for her to take-the-helm of the Oval Office.  This is why there is such resistance and in-fighting among the democrats.  Hillary expected all liberals to bend over and kiss her ring on the way down.  Obama is providing Newest School Liberals who are tired of a Clintonian Washington another option. 

If the democratic party appealed to me, you would see me supporting Obama just for the fun of watching Mrs. Clinton jump through all the hoops she needs to jump to garner support of more Newest School Liberals, if she can.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123456Next »