About Me

Name: Rick
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

Who was Conservatives' Reagan BEFORE Reagan?

This comic cracks me up!  The media are out there telling us that we NEED a new Reagan.  *dismissive wave*  Since GWB has proved himself to be NO REAGAN, according to what the media tell us, and none of the potential candidates on our side seems to be a NEW Reagan from THEIR perspective.
 
Well, let me ask this of you.  Who was our Reagan BEFORE there was a Reagan?  Had the media had their way, there wouldn't BE a Reagan, and these goons in the media want us to pick a Reagan before the elections so that they can rip him/her a new one BEFORE the election so that he/she looks as bad as possible so that the media can do the skewering they feel they need to do to "even the playing field."  We "conservatives" will just give up and stay home.
 
This is balderdash!  Again, who was our Ronald Reagan BEFORE there was a Ronald Reagan?  The media had kicked and bruised the memory of Richard Nixon such that only a fool embraced him at the end of the '70s!  This fool would NEVER get elected were he to embrace Nixon, and the media made sure of this.
 
So, all this media hoopla about "Who is the next Reagan?" is balderdash - B.S. for the more pedestrian among us.  The media are just upset that they haven't been able to trash Reagan's memory in the years since GHWB's election in '88 like they did to Nixon, and this is a Quixiotic effort to trash conservative windmills.
 
 
 
 
 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Where were these Gomers while Saddam killed his OWN people?



Good Lord!  This woman with the paint on her hands accosts Sec. Rice and claims that SHE is responsible for the "deaths of Iraqis."

Where were these people when Saddam was tossing innocents into shredders head first to keep his people at bay?  She is a Code Pink maroon.  You can see this from what you can read on her shirt just below her right arm.  What a bunch of goons these people are!  It would have been fun to have seen Condi take down this woman with a judo punch!  No idea if she KNOWS judo, but it would be fun to see her take down maroons like these!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Where are the French?

It dawned on me today that we need the French!

Here's why!  We need French to convince the people of Saudi Arabia that they can make it on their own sans the ruling family that has kept the country in its shadows for SO many years!

Would this be a clean break?  Not likely.  You would have the Islamists poking up their heads and pushing the people to embrace Islamofacism.  By then, maybe, we'll have the democracies in Iraq and Afghanistan working well and influencing thought among Arabs and Persians in the area also aiding to illustrate to the Saudi people that they CAN make it on their own.

Again, the forms of democracy that these two countries embrace may be NOTHING like what we embrace here in the States.  They MAY be independent from one another.  Who knows?  Only time will tell!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dem Leaders Realize New Source of Income!

So!  Harry Reid's letter to Rush Limbaugh's broadcasting partner is about to be sold to the highest bidder for a tad more than $2 million.

This MUST have the Dims seeing green because from their perspective it is their signatures only on this document that is fetching it all this money!  They see themselves as modern-day signers of the Declaration of Independence!

In fact, this is what they MAY do!  What they will do is draft a "new" Declaration of Independence that puts things into the "proper" order from THEIR perspective.  Then ALL the members of the Dimocratic senate will sign this document thinking that it will make them famous. 

None of them realizes that it was Harry's efforts to snub a private citizen with the power of the Senate that makes this document so valuable - not the signatures, but their eyes are seeing only the green!  So trying to redirect them will be fruitless.

My hope is that this document makes a national tour around the time of the elections in '08 because you would see me paying a ticket price to get a close look at this document behind some protective glass, of course.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

If you own stock in a company that sells lead (Pb), SELL!!!!!

Good Lord!

Everyone is going ape-sh*t over lead!

The Chinese, according to the media, are pumping it into EVERYTHING they're manufacturing and selling to us: baby toys and paint are the items that are receiving the most attenion these days!  All you parents out there need to do is to teach your children not to lick their toys and to wash their hands AFTER they are done playing with the toys, and EVERYTHING would be fine!  The lead content wouldn't be a concern for you or your kid at all, but the media don't want you to be a responsible parent who teaches his/her kid to wash his/her hands.  We must ALL be dirty (equal) in the eyes of the media.

NOW the latest mole to pop its head out of the machine is lipstick!  The wife explained this morning that she has known for YEARS that lipstick contained lead and that she knew how to detect the lead in the lipstick as well.  Well, that meant castigating her for FAILING to tell me early enough so that we could put a video on YouTube to show everyone else, here the Western World at least, how one goes about this.

You can find it on YouTube if you search on lipstick and lead.  There will be dozens more videos by now anyway!  The wife showed me first-hand how to do this as well, confirming what the video illustrated.  The good news is that it took longer for her lipstick to turn darker than it did for the lip poison the person in the video used to turn darker in a similar manner.  *laughter*

So, if one of the companies for which you own stock is known to sell lead, SELL IT!!!  Get out of there!  *laughter*
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who was Reagan BEFORE there was a Reagan?

What irks me these days is what is passing for "journalism" with the accent on "journal" in the term.

Most in the media are asking everyone,

"Who is the next Reagan?"

Well, let me remind you of the election in '80.  Granted, back then, you would have seen me only knee high to a grasshopper, but was there anyone looking for a "Reagan" in '80?  Nope!  Back then, the only lighthouse conservatives had in politics was Richard Nixon, and the media dimmed the intensity of his lighthouse SO much that none of the conservatives back then DARED to use him as a landmark!  Doing so meant becoming "Lost at Sea!"

The media have TRIED to do the same thing with Reagan to diminish the intensity of his light some, since his death only some years ago.  For example, they extrapolated his Alzheimer's back to when he was serving in office by saying, more or less, "look how much he is suffering from Alzheimer's at the end.  If he is suffering THIS much NOW, how much could it have affected him during his presidency?"  Granted, the media didn't SAY this literally, but the insinuations were there.

So they would insinutate further that we conservatives don't need to use Mr. Reagan as our contemporary lighthouse because the light he provided for those eight years in the '80s was "dim by reasons of illness."

Bring it on, pantywaists!  ONE of our guys will get us closer to the promised land. 

Back in the '80s, we conservatives didn't have FNC, or as the the other side like to call it "Faux News Channel."  They are so smart with THAT comment and the Gen. "Betrayus" comment too.  Is THIS all they have in their quivers?  Come on, guys and gals of the other side!  Can't you do better than this?  Sure!  We have fun, for example, with the name Sandy Burglar (Berger), but we don't make a political movement (e.g. Moveon.org) out of it, and there are court documents and confessions involving said burglar that the play on his name is VALID!!!  There is NOTHING that Petraeus has done as a commanding officer that gives us ANY motivation to call him a traitor, yet this is THEIR accusation!

What would kill me is to learn Sandy's real name is Sam Berger.  THEN it is SO easy to make the jump from Sam Berger to the Ham Burglar!  Now, THAT would be a funny revelation.

This reminds me SO much of my days as a boy scout!  In my troop back then we had a cabal of about four or five scouts who took it upon themselves, like the Dims of today, to make EVERYONE else's life as a scout in that troop as miserable as possible.  Two of these characters were brothers, and their father served as our troop's scoutmaster for many of the years that saw me participating with the troop until reaching the rank of Eagle Scout and moving on to a local sea scout post instead of the scout troop.

This little cabal kept to itself when it could.  They found themselves spread among the patrols, i.e. they did not participate all in ONE patrol, but they were nothing but a bunch of crybabies.  If they cried loudly enough, one of the fathers or even the scoutmaster himself would come to their aid.  It was pathetic.  My younger brother, who was also in the troop and the last of FOUR Eagle Scouts in my family, had to deal with them more than I because the elder brother of this pair was the same age as my younger brother.

Anyway, the dems of today have taken a shine to this attitude that these fellow scouts seemed to embrace 25 years ago.  They were nothing but crybabies back then, and the dems are nothing but crybabies today!  John Kerry emboddies this attitude to a "T."  Nothing but a crybaby whom somebody always needs to help.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Mullahs want the moolah! Here is the issue with Islam!

This dawned on me a couple of days ago with my participation in Yahoo Answers!  (YA!).  Someone posed the question as to why the Taliban allow their members to KILL other members of the Taliban sans any issue, more or less.  His grammar was a little suspect, but that is to be ignored in this posting.  Below is a link to the YA! page.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AuYAShYnjvpAVLiXN8U1dHHty6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071001060738AAxJYhX&show=7#profile-info-e996e1e2b74fcdcce913c186f8c9cfb5aa

One of the first answers was REALLY close and quite valid.  The Taliban are allowed to kill one another because they are members of a society, or cult, if you will, that permits any muslim to kill another muslim sans any issues being raised by the mosque, the governing body for the muslim faith.  My explanation goes into some detail as to WHY this is the case.  This revelation came to my tiny brain on its own and it made PERFECT sense.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Way to go, Erie, PA!

Did you hear?

A humble scientist in Erie, PA has discovered a method where he can burn SALT WATER using radio waves!

Where was Hitlary when it came to discovering THIS, eh?  (*props to you Cannuks*)

Originally, he was looking for a treatment to cure cancer, and this involved delivering a metal substance only to cancerous cells and then blasting simple radio waves at these cancerous cells.  The metal now associated with these cells would heat up due to the exposure to the radio waves, and the cancer cells would die, leaving the healthy cells unaffected!

While doing this research, he happened to discover that he could use the same radio waves to get simple salt water to separate into its two components: H2 and O2, and he could then combust them in a sustainable reaction that produced NOTHING but heat and water vapor. 

My question is what will this do to the "societies" that have grown up in the World of Oil?

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8RIRI600&show_article=1
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What is Osama thinking?

Osama Bin Laden released his newest video recently - maybe last night or the day before.  Who cares?  In the video, he pleads with the viewer "to join the Jihad against the infidels" in one manner or another.  All he wants these followers to do is to commit suicide while commiting homicide against these infidels.

Why can't Osame take a Christian perspective of this?  Why can't he have himself rubbed out so that he can rise from the dead and show us HIS way?  Why can't he do this?  Wouldn't he have MORE converts to his version Wahabiism were he to sacrifice himself, rise from the dead, and lead his followers to Allah himself? 

Oh?  This has happened before?  What was his name?  Oh, right.  Jesus Christ!  Forgive me. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What's going to happen if Al Qaeda decide to mark the Petreus speech with an attack?

So!  What's going to happen should the people whom the Dims here in the States are supporting decide that the time that Petreus has chosen to address Congress on the gains our forces have made in Iraq is a time in which it is best for them to make more attacks?

What will the Dims make of the timing of this attack and the subsequent deaths it generates?

Will it be another Tet?  My guess is that it won't because there is no N. Vietnam associated with the effort.  Sure, there is Iran, but the local Iraqis are able to see them like sore thumbs and discriminate between them and fellow Iraqis.  Who knows?

It's just a tiny thought.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Perhaps it all depends on your defintion of TAXES!

Do you smoke?  Oh!  You do?  You tired of paying the high prices associated with buying the premium brands of cigarettes? 

You are?  Well, you are killing yourself when you smoke!

Oh!  You already knew that!  Well, why do you do it then? 

Ah!  Smoking makes you feel good and it can put a shine on a seemingly miserable day?  Of course!  Makes sense!  It is YOUR life after all, and you are NOT a robot!  Well, thank goodness you DO smoke because the high taxes that you are paying are "helping" so many people!

So!  Let me get this straight!  Taxing an activity acts to deter the activity, right?  Sounds logical!  Since the activity costs more with the taxes fewer people will partake in the activity.  This makes a WORLD of sense to me.

So, if raising taxes deters an activity, then why are the Dims SO eager to raise taxes on the richest among us?  It's the richest among us who provide the capital for the rest of us to work, i.e. they buy the products that we produce, especially the HIGH-END products.

Yep!  Doesn't make sense to me.

What's that?  Yep!  If the economy tanks in the early months of '09, and a Dim is sitting behind-the-desk in the Oval Office, he/she is likely to blame Bush for the problem and throw his/her shoulders in the air and then point a finger at GWB.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Yahoo News claims that Hollywood is going to start producing MANY anti-war movies!

Forgive me for NOT reading the column, but my interest in the column waned as much as my desire to watch MANY of the sequels this summer.  The ONLY gain in this news announcement is that none of these movies is going to be called Plattoon II or Apocolypse Now and AGAIN.

After a summer of sequels, this may be good news for those of us who are hungry for something NEW from Hollywood.  In MY opinion, the LAST decent movie that Hollywood released was The Passion of the Christ three years ago, and no one in Hollywood wanted to touch it prior to its release, and the story it told is 2000 years old!  It subsequently became the HIGHEST grossing movie of ALL time.  Stick that in your eye, Hollywood.

These "new" movies aren't new at all.  They are the same pap that Hollywood has released since Vietnam.  Nothing new.  Same pap; different day.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sen. Kerry is FULL of SH*T!

 http://stream.rushlimbaugh.com/cgi-bin/stream.cgi?stream=clips/07/07/071907_3_kerry.wma&site=rushlimb&token=caCbKdSbSaJaRaNcZc4aFambAdBaScCddb_-bgN9Nu-bWG-EDrwEjr&type=windows_od&clips=&v=&start=&stop=&RL=

Not sure if you will be able to access this, but this is a recording of Kerry talking with poop coming out of-his-mouth! 

Weren't those "re-education camps" the same sort of camps Kerry doesn't like today in GITMO?  It depends on your definition of "re-eductation camps."  He has the NERVE to explain that those who endured these "re-education camps" are doing REALLY well in the communist culture of Vietnam.  Does this goon understand what he is saying?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Honest Source of Obama's Money.

If someone on Obama's team did an honest investigation of his supporters, he would learn, more than likely, that MANY of his contributors are conservatives who are giving him the money to fight Hitlary.  Well, it may be poorly-spent money, but it is theirs to spend as they see fit.  It was this same mentality that gave Howard Dean all that money, back in '04, which he screamed away!  *laughter*

These conservatives are the types who like to see dims sweat, and if it is a Clinton who is doing the sweating, THAT is even better.  It's a sly tactic, and none on the Obama team is going to do such an investigation!  What this allows some of my conservative breathren to do is to influence the other party in a way they wish.  With the dims, all you need to do is throw a little coin in the ring and watch them tear each other apart as they scrap for it.

Primary season can be better than the general election season if you know where to look and know what to expect.  It's great sport.

The issue continues.  The republicans in Minnesota are giving Al Franken a leg up.  Again, which is great!  NO problem with that.  That's fine.  It is THEIR money, and they can spend it any way that they like.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

First, it was Rumsfeld...next it will be Cheney.

The rabid dims went nuts when Rumsfeld resigned however many months ago it was.  For a while they fed on the Attorney General, but some richer meat has found its way into the water now.

Now, the dims have their sights set on the Number Two man - VP Cheney.  They are looking to remove all of Bush's support prior to his resignation and replacement in the beginning of '09.  They aren't patient enough to let him leave quietly.  They want to scratch up as much dust and make as much noise as they can.  They are looking to get Cheney in front of some cameras to catch him in a lie that they can plaster ALL over the 1830 hours network news shows.  They seem to believe that this will force Bush to demand his resignation somehow.  Shoot, pun intended, GWB refused to demand his resignation after Cheney shot a friend while they were hunting.

The Dims are just too funny, and they are gunning to get him removed-from-office before the election in '08.  They want to remove all of GWB's support so that he is standing alone by the time the election rolls around.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive