About Me

Name: Rick
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

What happened to Bush in eight months will happen to Obama within six months!

Posted by Rick on Monday, October 20, 2008 2:09:36 PM
 
Forgive me for not reading the column linked above, but my tiny brain doesn't need to concern itself with the details.  It has determined what the column is trying to tell us just from the title of the column, and it is this,
 
"What happened to Bush in eight months will happen to Sen. BO within SIX months, should he get elected."
 
To me, this sounds like a reason NOT to elect the guy!  They want to equate BO with GWB before he gets into office so that should things turn black, people will be able to raise the VP to the position of fortune teller.  *shrug*
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Watch Nancy Try To Dismiss Her Party's Responsibility In The Banking Fiasco.

Posted by Rick on Wednesday, September 17, 2008 12:45:56 PM
How stupid does this woman think we Americans are?
 
Perhaps, she feels that there are ENOUGH citizens in the country who DIDN'T get the "education" the liberals, who controlled the Congress for most of the last 60 years, have promised us.  Were we to get the education these poltroons promised, we would ALL know that the party in power in Congress is responsible for the economy - not the president nor the party that lost control of the House two years prior. 
 
For the last ten-to-15 years, the media have been telling us how "smart" Bill Clinton was during the '90s.  Why have they done this?  The LAST thing the media want is the people realizing that it was the REPUBLICANS in Congress who gave us the '90s.  The Congress got out of Americans' way and let them earn their money.  If you look at videos from way back then, you can see Billy's stupid smile, and this ought to be enough to convince you that he deserves NONE of the credit for the economy skyrocketing in the '90s.
 
What will happen if BO gets elected is that the media will tell us how WONDERFUL he is IF he reduces the amount he originally planned to raise everyone's taxes.  He will become the NEXT messiah, as far as the media will be concerned.  They won't bother with explaining how MORE wonderful things would be were he NOT to tax ANYONE!  *laughter*
 
Does ANYONE believe Pelosi will take the BLAME for the floor falling out on Wall and Broad over the last few weeks?
 
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/pelosi-dems-bear-no-responsibility-for-economic-crisis-2008-09-16.html
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It all depends on what your definition of "Change" is! *laughter*

Posted by Rick on Thursday, August 28, 2008 12:29:03 PM
The announcement of Sen. Biden as BO's VP running mate last week had me scratching my head after my ears heard the announcement on TV.  For MONTHS, BO's been telling us that HE is "Change we can believe in."  Ummm, people, there are FEW fellow lawmakers in DC who have the experience Biden "brings" to the ticket.  How can hiring someone who has dirtied his OWN hands in politics for more than 30 years involve "change?"
 
Sounds like MORE of the SAME old CR*P to me!  This is more evidence that BO thinks we're stupid tools who are meant to buy and believe all the pap he's selling.  Will the media question this selection?  Heaven's no!  As far as they're concerned, they're happy that they now won't have to dodge questions about BO's gravitas since he's selected such an "experienced" running mate.
 
All Biden will provide is being the fall-guy for the BO campaign in November once election results start rolling in.  The media will explain that BO's popularity was NEVER higher than it was BEFORE he selected Sen. Biden as his VP.  Biden will get trashed when this happens, and he will be to blaim for BO's loss.
 
What was BO thinking when it came time to select a running mate?  The smartest presidential candidates make an attempt to select a running mate who differs from him/her so that the pair can get MORE support from other people who see reason to support the pair due to the VP's personality.  These two came from the SAME casting.  The only difference between the two is that BO's political career started LATER than Biden's did.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Oh, where to begin today?

Posted by Rick on Monday, August 18, 2008 2:22:44 PM
Obama told us at the "debate" in California last night that his favorite Bible passage is where the Bible explains to us that what we do to the least among us we do to Christ (God).  Then he goes on to explain that he has NO problem with aborting UNWANTED children at ANY time prior to their birth.  If these "unwanted" children are NOT the least among us, then there can be scant few only who score lower than they do!  Talk about shooting one's self in the foot!   
 
My suspicion is that MORE U.S. citizens heard and understood this answer than the media would like to explain to us on the 1830 news or on the 24/7 news channels.  From my perspective, at the moment, BHO has sealed his fate; he is toast!  Whoever "prepared" him for this event needs to be fired and removed from the campaign.  This answer is so funny now that my tiny brain has considered it.  It smacks of Clintonese because it says,
 
"Look at how DEEP I am.  My 'concern' is for the LEAST among us because I said so!  Oh!  Want to abort your baby?  No problem.  It will be YOU who will have to answer for this 'killing' of YOUR unwanted child."
 
So, he's toast!  He shot himself in the foot with a howitzer!  *laughter*
 
It just dawned on me that he has done this to "give" Hillary an open door so that she can walk into the convention next week with her head held high with the expectation that she will WIN the nomination.
 
Makes me wonder if Hillary planted the person who worked as BO's advisor for this debate in Saddleback so that he would make this mistake and lose support among liberals who used to support Hillary but turned their back on her when they saw "the light" shining from BHO.  This advisor was a plant to do him in!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What the people at "The New Yorker" are trying to say with that magazine cover.

Posted by Rick on Thursday, July 17, 2008 11:49:32 AM
"Obama is going to lose due to America's racism."  This is what that cover is trying to tell to us in code that the brainiest liberals among us only can understand.  Were Obama to lose in November, then the authors can stand on their desks and scream,
 
"See!  We told you that America is filled with racists!"
 
That is what this cover image is trying to tell us.  The dims tried the Vietnam tactic with John F-ing Kerry with the LAST election and they had their butts handed to them.  They slapped a new coat of paint on the same sort of character and pushed him out front of the "expected" candidate who most of us thought would earn the nomination.
 
What will they do when the Obamagician fails to appear as the winner in November?  He's doomed.  It's the "Silent Majority" all over again.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »